All science is experiential; but all experience must be related back to and derives its its validity from the conditions and context of consciousness in which it arises, i.e., the totality of our nature.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Science is the systematic classification of experience.
Science always has its origin in the adaptation of thought to some definite field of experience.
Experience by itself is not science.
If there were a science of human beings it would be anthropology that aims at understanding the totality of experience through structural context.
Our science fails to recognize those special properties of life that make it fundamental to material reality. This view of the world - biocentrism - revolves around the way a subjective experience, which we call consciousness, relates to a physical process. It is a vast mystery and one that I have pursued my entire life.
In nature, when you conduct science, it is the natural world that is the ultimate decider in what is true and what is not.
Science is empirical, all about physical senses that tell us about the world. But physical senses are not the only senses we have. Nobody has ever seen a thought. Nobody has ever seen a feeling. And yet thoughts and feelings are where we live our lives most immediately, and science cannot connect with that.
We have found that where science has progressed the farthest, the mind has but regained from nature that which the mind put into nature.
The experience of life consists of the experience which the spirit has of itself in matter and as matter, in mind and as mind, in emotion, as emotion, etc.
Science is the greatest creative impulse of our time. It dominates the intellectual scene and forms our lives, not only in the material things which it has given us, but also in that it guides our spirit.
No opposing quotes found.