Characters stretching their legs in some calm haven generally don't make for interesting protagonists.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
To me the interesting main character is never the one without flaws.
I try to always stretch myself to fit the characters that have been presented.
I think conflicted characters are always more interesting.
As a writer, I have this compulsion to take characters who appear formidable and bombard them with adversity until they crumble. What's interesting is watching them rise again, and seeing how they've changed and grown, if indeed they have.
It's good to know that other people think differently, and that's what makes the characters interesting.
A character on screen that's the 'good guy' or the 'bad guy,' they're never interesting. There's got to be an internal struggle, the duality is important to find.
I think that characters who are nice all the time and who you sympathize with can get really boring.
More eccentric characters can push pretty far, but if you stay on the side of reality, it's always funnier.
I always think people who stretch themselves are interesting. That's something to admire, isn't it?
People who act against their own best interests are interesting characters.