I've never gone into analysis. But Freud opened a door, I know.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The problem of psychoanalysis is not the body of theory that Freud left behind, but the fact that it never became a medical science. It never tried to test its ideas.
The psychoanalytic method is essentially a historical method.
And yet there are some magnificent things from Freud, profound insights into the nature of man.
All psychological research is completely barred by the interpretations of the psychoanalysts. Everything happens in the unconscious, and I don't know what this unconscious is.
Analysis gave me great freedom of emotions and fantastic confidence. I felt I had served my time as a puppet.
Very few people have actually read Freud, but everyone seems prepared to talk about him in that Woody Allen way. To read Freud is not as much fun.
I thought foolishly that Freudian psychoanalysis was deeper and more intensive than other, more directive forms of therapy, so I was trained in it and practiced it.
Freud was one of the greatest influences on me. He made myth into psychiatry, and I've been trying to turn it back into myth again.
Freud was just a novelist.
I'm not that taken with Freudian perspectives. They seem to be overcomplicated.