I don't find biology as interesting as politics and humanism. I talk more about existential stuff.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
My interest in biology was pretty much always on the philosophical side.
I mean that I think I find the psychology of people more interesting than politics. I think the psychology of politics is more interesting than straight politics.
My interests span biology, though sometimes I feel like an anachronism, somebody from the Victorian era when there weren't so many boundaries dividing the sciences.
I believe that politics takes a much different set of skills than science. Science is about getting to the truth. Politics is about what people think and how they react.
I like writing about biology, not doing it.
I like problems at the borders of disciplines. One of the reasons that neurobiology of learning and memory appeal to me so much was that I liked the idea of bringing biology and psychology together.
There is more and more data indicating that there is a biological basis to your political views.
It doesn't matter whether it is chemistry or immunology or neuroscience: I just do research on what I find interesting.
Perhaps arising from a fascination with animals, biology seemed the most interesting of sciences to me as a child.
The biology of mind bridges the sciences - concerned with the natural world - and the humanities - concerned with the meaning of human experience.
No opposing quotes found.