Loads of computer graphics equals a terrible video in my book.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Currently computer graphics are used a great deal, but it can be excessive.
I always get sick of these conversations where people are so obsessed with pixels, with high definition, and even with technology in general. I find it just dull and heartless. And so I wanted to use only the worst machines.
I'm pretty strict with videos, at least the imagery stuff.
It's very difficult to read a book on your computer.
The computer brings out the worst in some people.
I worked for seven years doing computer graphics to pay my way through graduate school - I have no romance with computer work. There's no amount of phony graphics and things making sound effects on the screen that can change that.
I think my books come out very visual, which is an obvious consequence.
One of the problems I have with a lot of movies these days is that everything is too well lit. In the world of digital creations there is a tendency to show too much.
In computer animation, every detail has to be thought out, designed, modeled, shaded, placed and lit. The more you add, the more computer memory you need.
A wide screen just makes a bad film twice as bad.
No opposing quotes found.