Natural objects, for example, must be experienced before any theorizing about them can occur.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
In the history of science, we often find that the study of some natural phenomenon has been the starting point in the development of a new branch of knowledge.
The pure natural scientist is liable to forget that minds exist, and that if it were not for them he could neither know nor act on physical objects.
I strongly believe that the fundamental laws of nature are not emergent phenomena.
Theories of evolution must provide for the creative acts which brought such theories into existence.
Within this widest concept of object, and specifically within the concept of individual object, Objects and phenomena stand in contrast with each other.
In fact, quantitative findings of any material and energy changes preserve their full context only through their being seen and understood as parts of a natural order.
I believe inanimate objects have a spirit.
Every description of natural processes must be based on ideas which have been introduced and defined by the classical theory.
Objects are what matter. Only they carry the evidence that throughout the centuries something really happened among human beings.
I hold that the mark of a genuine idea is that its possibility can be proved, either a priori by conceiving its cause or reason, or a posteriori when experience teaches us that it is in fact in nature.