The Booker 2011 is of no more interest to me than the world heavyweight championship, which I'm not going to win either. It's irrelevant.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
As a professional wrestler, it's not my position to be the booker, to formulate a match, unless you're asked to do that.
You don't know what it is to be heavyweight champ of the world until you become the heavyweight champ of the world.
The Booker Prize is a big, popular prize for big, popular books, and that's the way it should be.
People aren't quite sure what it means when a book is a Booker Prize winner. They're not quite sure what is being recommended, what literary values it stands for, because every year it stands for something different.
Is the prestige conferred by the Man Booker prize for the book or me? I would prefer it on the book and for me to be treated ordinarily.
I'm sure I wouldn't have been asked to judge the Man Booker if it weren't for 'Downton.'
Who would have ever thought that, within a couple months of getting into the WWE, that I'd be wrestling in the main event for the world championship? Then, nine months after getting here, actually being the world champion.
I do not think wrestling is going to save the world.
I'm always telling Don King's people when there's a top-10 heavyweight they've got that needs an opponent, I'm ready.
I'll always struggle over saying I'm a writer, even if I won the Booker Prize.
No opposing quotes found.