You need a continuous picture of how things are evolving, and not a slow series of snapshots where you don't know how frame A is related to frame B.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Architecture has a strong link with the movies in terms of time progression, sequencing, framing, all of that.
As we watch TV or films, there are no organic transitions, only edits. The idea of A becoming B, rather than A jumping to B, has become foreign.
A picture story just doesn't run like a film. It doesn't have 24 frames per second. It doesn't deal with this illusion of movement.
It is the framework which changes with each new technology and not just the picture within the frame.
Life rarely presents fully finished photographs. An image evolves, often from a single strand of visual interest - a distant horizon, a moment of light, a held expression.
Every frame and every scene has to have an intention.
What counts isn't the frame, it's what you put in it.
I know that some filmmakers strive for a kind of naturalistic approach, but you're never going to capture something that's really natural - just the simple fact that you choose to put a frame around something means that you've already chosen one particular thing to put more attention on.
It is no longer important for me to be seen in every frame.
I am impressed with what happens when someone stays in the same place and you took the same picture over and over and it would be different, every single frame.