You know, the whole philosophy of ad hoc combinations has its strengths and its weaknesses.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
There's no limit to how complicated things can get, on account of one thing always leading to another.
There are lots of ways to work together.
The power of one, if fearless and focused, is formidable, but the power of many working together is better.
Ideas rose in clouds; I felt them collide until pairs interlocked, so to speak, making a stable combination.
The idea of recognising your strengths and using them in as versatile a way as you can is cool to me.
And so from that, I've always been fascinated with the idea that complexity can come out of such simplicity.
Adaptability is key.
They say that structure is freedom, and in a sense it is. When you're dealing with multiple constraints, you have to figure out what you can get out of that.
Complexity that works is built up out of modules that work perfectly, layered one over the other.
Only strength can cooperate. Weakness can only beg.