Rome had Senators too, that's why it declined.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Ancient Rome declined because it had a Senate, now what's going to happen to us with both a House and a Senate?
Rome was great in arms, in government, in law.
What we need now is a Treaty of the World not a Treaty of Rome.
Italy has changed. But Rome is Rome.
Rome was not built in one day.
That Rome was comparatively great and wealthy is certain.
If the Romans had been obliged to learn Latin, they would never have found time to conquer the world.
One reason the Founding Fathers thought that states should have two senators was so that smaller states wouldn't get run over and could bring their interests to the attention of the Senate more broadly.
The United States Senate wasn't designed to be a majority-rule institution. It was designed to include and accommodate the rights of the minority in small states as well as large states.
I always thought 'Rome' would change things for me, that people would finally understand what I do.
No opposing quotes found.