What we need now is a Treaty of the World not a Treaty of Rome.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Rome had Senators too, that's why it declined.
In case of war, a treaty would have to be made at the end of the war.
The arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and assistance to foreign hands should be curtailed, lest Rome fall.
If the Romans had been obliged to learn Latin, they would never have found time to conquer the world.
If the discussion centres on the essential principle of the E.U., the free movement of people and the ability to make decisions together, in that case, we don't want treaty change.
Italy has changed. But Rome is Rome.
And this speaks to the larger problem that no one wants to talk about: the restoration of the Roman rite is a precondition for a long-term fix for the problem.
Ancient Rome declined because it had a Senate, now what's going to happen to us with both a House and a Senate?
Rome was great in arms, in government, in law.
We do not need the empire to give us anything.