It doesn't stand up to huge intellectual scrutiny.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I don't like the intellectual label.
If someone's criticism is completely unfounded on data, then I don't want to hear it. It doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
There are very few jobs where you're held up to public scrutiny.
It's not highly intellectual material. I'm dedicating it to the pulp fiction of the past.
There's always something suspect about an intellectual on the winning side.
Our concerns aren't always appropriate or morally elevated.
It is scrutiny by the general public that keeps the powerful honest.
I do have concerns about the current efforts to restructure our nation's intelligence community.
Judgment is more than skill. It sets forth on intellectual seas beyond the shores of hard indisputable factual information.
The thing that's been inhibiting long-form investigative reporting is fear - fear of being sued, of being unpopular, of being criticized by very powerful groups.
No opposing quotes found.