In the end, the market will decide which is the better performer: dirty coal-fired power or clean wind and solar. Market-based competition. That doesn't sound like communism to me.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The market we're going after is the clean-energy market.
Communism is a monopolistic system, economically and politically.
You have to recognize what the markets are doing, what the rules and regulations are doing, and all the more reasons that we've got to find some more solutions in particular with coal.
Coal is cheap, but up to what extent are we going to allow coal plants to operate?
If you want improvements in coal, you've got to keep people in the business.
Communism is a monopolistic system, economically and politically. The system suppresses individual initiative, and the 21st century is all about individualism and freedom. The development of technology supported these directions.
The communist model does not work economically, we all realised that, but the capitalist model in the modern world also looks to be unsustainable.
I don't like Communism because it hands out wealth through rationing books.
Anytime we make additional investment in a coal plant, we are really challenging whether that investment is economic.
The government is shutting down the coal industry, they say it's cheaper to draw nuclear power off the French grid and cheaper to buy coal from Colombia.
No opposing quotes found.