And most of my early pictures failed but about one in a 100 somehow looked better than what I saw.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I was just taking pictures to see what they looked like. Just for the fun of it. It wasn't about anything in some cases. Some of them were just about the joy of opening up an aperture and seeing what shows up.
I have done my best. I saw a fatal flaw in the camera industry. We did our best to address it.
30 years and 55 pictures - not more than five that were any good, or any good for me.
When I started, you didn't focus so much on production, certainly not - gosh - down to the finest little detail of how you shifted your eyes or how you turned to somebody. A lot of the shots were far away from a still camera. There weren't as many close-ups and intimacy.
I definitely take a lot of bad pictures!
I was pleased that two very disparate photographs, two images that each worked in their own way had appealed enough to other people for them to buy them. I was also relieved they weren't the last ones purchased, and that they sold for a pound more than the frame was worth.
The ratio of successful shots is one in God-knows-how-many. Sometimes you'll get several in one contact sheet, and sometimes it's none for days. But as long as you go on taking pictures, you're likely to get a good one at some point.
It's far better to shoot a good picture than a good-looking picture.
The more pictures you see, the better you are as a photographer.
Ironically, my paintings don't photograph well.
No opposing quotes found.