Psychoanalysts seem to be long on information and short on application.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I'm not much of an analyzer or a psychologist.
I mean being a writer is like being a psychoanalyst, but you don't get any patients.
I wrote several articles criticizing psychoanalysis, but the analysts weren't listening to my objections. So I finally quit after practicing it for six years.
Psychoanalysts are not occupied with the minds of their patients; they do not believe in the mind but in a cerebral intestine.
I've never gone into analysis. But Freud opened a door, I know.
Many psychoanalysts refused to let me speak at their meetings. They were exceptionally vigorous because I had previously been an analyst and they were very angry at my flying the coop.
But there has also been a notable increase in recent years of these applications by a much wider slice of psychotherapists - far greater interest than ever before.
Psycho-analyses, how disgusting.
I trained in psychiatry in the 1970s, and much of our training was about what was then psychoanalytic theory, with a little bit of theory from Jungian psychology and a few other places.
The psychoanalytic method is essentially a historical method.
No opposing quotes found.