We will wait to see if it is a doozy before we decide how to cover it, and what it all means.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
When my 'Scientific American' arrives every month, I read it cover to cover.
We need to talk about what we are going to do and see and decide. We'll have to wait and see.
And, believe me; they will do everything to cover this up.
What's coming will come and we'll just have to meet it when it does.
Thank God for our form of government. The media won't let there be any cover-up.
Oh it's clearly a cover up. I mean, I have no reluctance in saying that.
I'm not trying to be coy here; we're just not prepared to give a lot of detail about our thinking, but we will be making some announcements in the coming months.
For the most part, editors no longer view 'Doonesbury' as a rolling provocation, which is fine by me. It makes no sense to intentionally antagonize the very people on whose support you most depend.
We want to connect all these musical worlds together. We just improvise; we know straight away if its going to work or not. They're not covers - I hate the word cover. We do a transcription: mix it up, put our own spin on it. I think people will be surprised how powerful our show is.
We made this really dumb decision to put on the cover nothing from South Park but just a real life photo of a piece of pooh dressed up like Mr. Hankey, and a lot of people didn't, they didn't even know what it was.