Matters of taste are not, it turns out, moral issues.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Most of the bad taste I've been accused of has been generic bad taste; it's been making fun of an idea as opposed to a person.
In my estimation, the only thing that is more to be guarded against than bad taste is good taste.
Sometimes it's more important to be human, than to have good taste.
The kind of people who always go on about whether a thing is in good taste invariably have very bad taste.
Bad taste is simply saying the truth before it should be said.
Deciding taste is egotistical, but that's how taste is established, by somebody having the courage to say, 'I don't want to sell that.'
People care more about being thought to have taste than about being thought either good, clever or amiable.
Any dispute in matters of taste usually results in a standoff.
If your choice enters into it, then taste is involved - bad taste, good taste, uninteresting taste. Taste is the enemy of art, A-R-T.
There is a fine line between censorship and good taste and moral responsibility.