A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there's no question about it.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship.
The transition from dictatorship to democracy is always very difficult, and if you read a history of any country that went through this, it wasn't easy. And, you know, you don't end dictatorship one day and next day you have fully fledged democracy.
I could never go into politics, because I'm far too impatient and I'd want to be a dictator, albeit a benevolent one... I would hope.
Military dictatorship, you can focus on it, you can fight it directly. It's a band of power-driven people.
Sometimes it's better to have a benign dictator than a dumb democracy, to be honest.
In our modern age - in the age of free information - I don't think there is any place for dictatorships.
We have to implant democracies where there are now dictatorships.
We know that dismantling old oppressive regimes is a great deal faster and easier than building new flourishing democracies. Chinggis Khaan once said, 'It was easier to conquer the world on horseback than to dismount and govern.' True validation of democracy lies less in what we tear down, and more in what we build.
The difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you don't have to waste your time voting.
There are a lot of benefits representative of government and it is far better than any type of dictatorial system and it is far better than a one-man rule situation.