When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I believe in benevolent dictatorship provided I am the dictator.
A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there's no question about it.
We have to implant democracies where there are now dictatorships.
The difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you don't have to waste your time voting.
Democracy may not prove in the long run to be as efficient as other forms of government, but it has one saving grace: it allows us to know and say that it isn't.
Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty.
We know that dismantling old oppressive regimes is a great deal faster and easier than building new flourishing democracies. Chinggis Khaan once said, 'It was easier to conquer the world on horseback than to dismount and govern.' True validation of democracy lies less in what we tear down, and more in what we build.
Sometimes it's better to have a benign dictator than a dumb democracy, to be honest.
I'm a benevolent dictator.
There are a lot of benefits representative of government and it is far better than any type of dictatorial system and it is far better than a one-man rule situation.