I often painted fragments of things because it seemed to make my statement as well as or better than the whole could.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I think a painting should include more experience than simply intended statement.
But when I worked on a painting I would do it from a drawing but I would put certain things I was fairly sure I wanted in the painting, and then collage on the painting with printed dots or painted paper or something before I really committed it.
I said, I don't want to paint things like Picasso's women and Matisse's odalisques lying on couches with pillows. I don't want to paint people. I want to paint something I have never seen before. I don't want to make what I'm looking at. I want the fragments.
I had tried painting, mostly to give myself a greater appreciation of the craft and to inform how I looked at paintings. That led to collaging some of the work I had done on paper, and I found myself mixing in found pieces as well.
The things that I paint are things that I know very well.
Painting is a nail to which I fasten my ideas.
I get painted quite a bit as a tragic figure because of some of the stuff that's happened in my life.
I paint things as they are. I don't comment.
I slowly dismantled the act of painting, to consider the possibility that no-thing ever really transcends its immediate environment.
Well, I have a very simple method of painting.
No opposing quotes found.