I'm never a reliable narrator, unbiased or objective.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I was a lousy journalist. I could never be objective. Sometimes I invented the whole story.
I think every first-person narrator in a novel should be compromised. I prefer that word to 'unreliable.'
One of the fun things about unreliable narrators is they can be funny. You can admire things about them and laugh with them.
I am not one of the great journalists of my time.
I'm not a great writer.
I'm not good at dialogue. I'm not good at holding a mirror up at a real world. I'm not good at believable characterisation.
With narration, you have to be very accurate with your voice. It's a good exercise to do.
You can never trust what you read.
The whole sort of debate of classic objective journalism versus a new immersion journalism - that can go on forever... I made no bones about my position: I don't think you can be objective.
I'm not really a good reader. What I mean is, I think I'm not one of those people who can read a story and analyze it just like that.
No opposing quotes found.