I truthfully think, a consistent coach over 30 years, probably, I'd rather be that than having one championship and mediocrity for years.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Those that coach 10 years that take a year off are three times better coaches... in year 11.
I think what coaching is all about, is taking players and analyzing there ability, put them in a position where they can excel within the framework of the team winning. And I hope that I've done that in my 33 years as a head coach.
I think one of the things about being a good coach is to recognise when you have given all that you can. In fact there should be some sort of unspoken law that says that a coach cannot have anyone for three or four years - if you have not passed on most of the stuff you know in that time, then you are not doing a good job.
Even though I retired from coaching, I still believe that is my calling.
So I don't really believe that how many years you've had in the league determines how well your players play... Coaching is coaching.
All I can say is that I'm going to try to coach the way I've coached in the past. And if it ends up not being good enough, then so be it.
I like playing. I wouldn't be a good coach. I don't have the patience to be a coach.
Coaching wouldn't be for me. No, certainly not.
I'd give my life to be the national team coach.
I don't think a coach becomes the right coach until he wins a championship.