Subjective artists are one-eyed, but objective artists are blind.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Artists are definitely, like, under a sort of microscope of scrutiny more than others.
Sometimes as an artist you get wrapped up in what you are doing and you can't be objective.
No great artist ever sees things as they really are. If he did, he would cease to be an artist.
I don't consider myself an artist. I consider myself a very opinionated man who uses words as fighting tools.
I think the definition of an artist is not necessarily tied into excellence or talent; an artist is somebody who, if you took away their freedom to make art, would lose their mind.
Art is so subjective, and people can react however they want.
The creative artist seems to be almost the only kind of man that you could never meet on neutral ground. You can only meet him as an artist. He sees nothing objectively because his own ego is always in the foreground of every picture.
Artists themselves are not confined, but their output is.
All artists are egotistical maniacs with inferiority complexes.
There's a point where art is not subjective, and my example for that is Picasso. If you don't like Picasso, that's your problem.