Art is so subjective, and people can react however they want.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Art is a subjective thing, and it should be a subjective thing. And the difficulty of subjectivity is that it becomes hugely problematized when you start applying large sums of money to art objects. That's where it all starts to get a bit sticky.
I'm glad I made a piece of art that can be interpreted so widely. Art is always interpreted subjectively.
Art is subjective. I'm not looking for people's praise.
Art is a subject that is inundated with opinions. In fact, that's all it is about is opinions.
I mean, art for art's sake is ridiculous. Art is for the sake of one's needs.
Defining art is huge; I feel like it's such a subjective thing. It's more like what's not art. You know what I mean? I think there can be an art in the way people live their lives, and art can be a gift someone gives to somebody.
Art is essentially communication. It doesn't exist in a vacuum. That's why people make art, so other people can relate to it.
Art is for anyone. It just isn't for everyone. Still, over the past decade, its audience has hugely grown, and that's irked those outside the art world, who get irritated at things like incomprehensibility or money.
I think art comes from some sense of discomfort with the world, some sense of not quite fitting with it.
There's a point where art is not subjective, and my example for that is Picasso. If you don't like Picasso, that's your problem.