It seems to be a law of design that for every advantage introduced through redesign, there is an accompanying unintended disadvantage.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I don't think it's so much of a disadvantage setting up from scratch.
Too much redesign has to do more with fad and fashion than with fitness and function. It is change for the sake of change. Such redesign is not only unnecessary, it is all too often also retrogressive, leading to things that work less effectively than those they were designed to replace.
In my opinion, no single design is apt to be optimal for everyone.
In architecture the idea degenerated. Design allows a more direct and pleasurable route.
Design is a tool that either allows us to create new markets or disrupt existing ones.
People with advantages are loath to believe that they just happen to be people with advantages.
Design is an unknown.
To every disadvantage there is a corresponding advantage.
Every disadvantage has its advantage.
For much of its existence, design was all about convenience. We wanted to hide technology so that users are not distracted into thinking about the tools they use.