If you can't compete fairly, honestly, effectively, no government should intervene. Now, some governments do. They prop up failing industries.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Our position should not be on how to eliminate the competition at all expenses, but we should focus on what we're going to do in order to make sure that Americans turn to the road of prosperity with the trajectory of capitalism, because making a profit is not an evil.
If you change the rules of the market, you can be more successful than your competitors.
I do not want to put U.S. companies in a position where their competitors are behaving in a way that is inconsistent with the way they are required to behave. That is neither fair, nor will it solve the problem.
I'm not against government involvement in times of need. I am for recognizing that big public companies will continue to cut jobs in an effort to prop up stock prices, which in turn stimulates the need for more government involvement.
While admirers of capitalism, we also to a certain extent believe it has limitations that require government intervention in markets to make them work.
It's our government; just leave us alone and... let the free market create the jobs.
I don't think we can go back to the old days. But I think that what the government needs to do is it needs to make sure that the pricing is fair, that you don't have monopolies out there, so that people don't have a chance to compete fairly.
Indeed, we must foster cost-saving competition. And that means joining the marketplace of other industrialized countries - not just for the manufacturers who sell drugs, but for consumers as well.
I tell them the rules are made by the government. Every firm should comply. It doesn't mean they can't compete.
At every turn, small businesses should be encouraged to compete. When they do, we all win.