I tell them the rules are made by the government. Every firm should comply. It doesn't mean they can't compete.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
If you can't compete fairly, honestly, effectively, no government should intervene. Now, some governments do. They prop up failing industries.
I do not want to put U.S. companies in a position where their competitors are behaving in a way that is inconsistent with the way they are required to behave. That is neither fair, nor will it solve the problem.
If you change the rules of the market, you can be more successful than your competitors.
Everybody agrees that you want competition. But you have to have rules of fair competition if you want to have competitors to enter the market.
Companies shouldn't use the law to prevent consumers from doing something legal.
I'm probably a believer in abandoning too-big-to-fail firms or breaking them up in some way so that the system can try to take care of itself. I imagine you're not going to get there, and therefore, I suspect regulation is what's going to be required.
You can't have some institutions that are protected by the law, not allowed to fail, and not held to account, and all the other companies in America are allowed to fail. You can't have equal justice under law and too big to fail.
Dominant companies have a special responsibility to ensure that the way they do business doesn't prevent competition... and does not harm consumers and innovation.
I plan to eliminate regulations that hinder domestic companies, particularly large conglomerates from investing in other companies.
When businesses affirmatively like regulations, that's when to reach for your wallet.
No opposing quotes found.