I think good radio often uses the techniques of fiction: characters, scenes, a big urgent emotional question. And as in the best fiction, tone counts for a lot.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I think good radio often uses the techniques of fiction: characters, scenes, a big urgent emotional question. And as in the best fiction, tone counts for a lot. But a lot of effective and interesting radio is based on one character who reacts to the world.
If you are interested in ideas, radio is way more pure than television. You're not distracted by somebody's nose or hair or posture. You can really see how someone thinks and penetrate to the essence of who that person is.
For years everyone looked toward the demise of radio when television came along. Before that, they thought talking movies might eliminate radio as well. But radio just keeps getting stronger.
Good fiction must be entertaining, but what makes fiction special - and True - is that the realness of a novel allows it to carry a larger message.
I always read what I write out loud, and I did that long before any radio thing. My editor finds that unusual.
Radio allowed people to act with their hearts and minds.
I like the storytelling and reading the letters, the long-distance dedications. Anytime in radio that you can reach somebody on an emotional level, you're really connecting.
Honestly, there are so many things about structuring a story for film and telling a story for film that are really different from doing radio.
Where radio is different than fiction is that even mediocre fiction needs purpose, a driving question.
Radio is such a perfect medium for the transmission of poetry, primarily because there just is the voice, there's no visual distraction.