There are more sure marks of authenticity in the Bible that in any profane history.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Perhaps the most telling witness against the claim of accurate history for the Bible comes when we read the earliest narrative of the crucifixion found in Mark's gospel and discover that it is not based on eyewitness testimony at all.
No writer of a portion of the Bible was perfect. It was the direct and miraculous operation of the Holy Spirit that what they wrote is without mistake.
The goal of Bible translation is be transparent to the original text - to see as clearly as possible what the biblical authors actually wrote.
The accepted versions of the Bible are all substantially correct.
With so many contradictory renditions of the biblical text, the public has lost confidence that we can actually know what the Bible says. It is an easy step from this skepticism to an indifference about what the Bible says.
So long as the New Testament served to decipher the Old, it was taken as an absolute norm.
The Bible is a history book.
The Bible is God's sacred Word of truth.
The Bible is worth all the other books which have ever been printed.
Intense study of the Bible will keep any writer from being vulgar, in point of style.
No opposing quotes found.