What spectacle can be more edifying or more seasonable, than that of Liberty and Learning, each leaning on the other for their mutual and surest support?
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I love movies with spectacle but spectacle can be a performance, it doesn't have to be a creature.
Museums, I think, are becoming more and more aware of how to turn themselves into a must-see spectacle.
As for the level of spectacle of the two disciplines, I leave it to the people who watch the races to comment.
For me, the reason why people go to a mountaintop or go to the edge of the ocean is to look at something larger than themselves. That feeling of awe, of going to a cathedral, it's all about feeling lost in something bigger than oneself. To me, that's the definition of spectacle.
You can't blame movies for embracing spectacle; filmmakers since D.W. Griffith and Cecil B. De Mille have loved spectacle, and spectacle is something that movies convey like no other medium, especially in a digital age.
I don't know how to do the other, so I won't even consider television until the audience's taste changes.
Vision is perhaps our greatest strength... it has kept us alive to the power and continuity of thought through the centuries, it makes us peer into the future and lends shape to the unknown.
I think the audience would like to see movies that are stunning to watch. I really think they'd like to see spectacles.
Vision looks inward and becomes duty.
The cooperation of the two retina in one field of vision, whatever is its cause, must rather be the source of all the ideas to which single or double vision may give rise.
No opposing quotes found.