I'm interested in the idea that we have a more inclusive, clearer set of objectives. I would want us to have a set of objectives which does include public ownership of some necessary things such as rail.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I think we should talk about what the objectives of the party are, whether that's restoring the Clause Four as it was originally written or it's a different one, but I think we shouldn't shy away from public participation, public investment in industry, and public control of the railways.
A set definite objective must be established if we are to accomplish anything in a big way.
We are trying to construct a more inclusive society. We are going to make a country in which no one is left out.
All I wanted was for the public to be able to have a say in how they are governed. That is a milestone we left a long time ago.
Railroads are the primary economic beneficiaries. It's a difficult project for the public sector.
Our objective in regulation should be to put in place tough enough regulation and capital and liquidity standards that we level the playing field and make it costly.
Firms would be given initial entitlements to gross markup on the basis of past performance. These entitlements would be transferable and a market in them would be developed.
Nobody - myself included - believes that we could ever achieve total information awareness. But the government needs to set goals and long-range objectives. Total information awareness is a good goal.
The rail service is important for my district.
Goals and objectives are based on theories and foundations.