The U.S. needs to control the Middle East, the gateway to Asia. It already has military installations in Uzbekistan.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There isn't a doubt that Iran constitutes the single most important single-country strategic challenge to the United States and to the kind of Middle East that we want to see.
The United States being in Asia is unambiguously a good thing for the region.
One of the things the United States does well is building coalitions. What the U.S. knows is that if you don't have a coalition with you, you will have a coalition against you. I don't want to see China and Russia on the side of Iran more strongly than they are.
The great problem there is we have to have the cooperation of those other Asian countries.
Russia, their number one client in the Middle East is Syria; that is their foothold in the Middle East. They want to have influence there.
Afghanistan is one of the poorest countries on earth. Security issue or no security issue, there would need to be a focus on it.
America needs a sensible, sustainable Iran policy that can meet U.S. security and economic interests, command international support and withstand the shifting Middle Eastern sands.
After spending time in the East and meeting with ordinary Afghans there, it's hard to imagine how a future Afghan government will retain control of provinces such as Khost or Paktia once U.S. forces are gone.
Afghanistan is a country in need. Afghanistan needs to protect itself in the region; Afghanistan needs to secure itself within the country. Afghanistan needs to develop its forces, and Afghanistan needs to provide stability to the people.
Iran with a nuclear weapon or with fissile material that can be given to Hezbollah or Hamas or others has the potential of not just destabilizing the Middle East. But it could be brought here.
No opposing quotes found.