Saying the Tech Bloom is not commercially driven is like saying Mother Teresa had an interest in the poor.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The critical reaction to 'Bloom' has been similar to 'Brick.' There are people on board with it and people who are not.
I don't think people buy technology products because of the personalities of the people behind them.
Tech companies don't exist in a bubble; they draw from and feed into a larger community. Ideally, the relationship is symbiotic.
Our industry has invested so much money in technology that perhaps it's time to invest in talent, in people.
Companies are not ingenious, it's the people in them that are.
The most important innovators often don't need any technologies - just imagination and acute sensitivity to people's needs.
Golden opportunities are nothing to laziness, but industry makes the commonest chances golden.
Any entrepreneur worth their salt knows that their brand is worthless if it doesn't somehow contribute to society or the overall good of the planet.
You can always think that we're old and not innovative, but there is no company that can limp on for 139 years without being creative and having the genes to change.
I definitely think what drives technology companies is the people; because in a technology company it's always about what are you going to do next.