There is not enough magic in a bloodline to forge an instant, irrevocable bond.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Nothing can so pierce the soul as the uttermost sigh of the body.
It wouldn't be 'True Blood' if somebody didn't die.
You don't build a bond without being present.
What 'True Blood' does really well is that it balances on the line between good and evil - you blur the distinction between the two.
What atonement is there for blood spilt upon the earth?
No real blood flows in the veins of the knowing subject constructed by Locke, Hume, and Kant, but rather the diluted extract of reason as a mere activity of thought.
The striking thing about the Precious Blood is the bond it establishes between love and suffering in our experience, a bond that has become so close that we have come to think of suffering accepted with joy as the most authentic sign of love with any depth at all.
Blood is one of the things that made fights cool. Like, you knew it had gotten serious. I understand why we don't do it anymore.
It seemed to me that you make magic real by making it a little prosaic, a little difficult and disappointing - never quite as glamorous as the other characters imagine.
It never felt real to me. I never felt I had complete ownership over Bond. Because you'd have these stupid one-liners - which I loathed - and I always felt phony doing them.
No opposing quotes found.