You need to find the size of performance that's appropriate to the material, appropriate to the shot, or appropriate to the scene.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
When you're on a set it can be very tedious and slow. It's just not as big as when you see it on film.
I've done scenes in films that I felt like the performance was better in certain takes, but they couldn't use them because it didn't match what the person was doing when they came around and the camera was on them.
Each performance and each film is what it is. It's right and belongs within that moment. You look at it and try to make it fit your particular part of your character and your particular film.
If you focus your energy on the camera, it takes away from the time you have to focus on the performances.
I'm never certain of a performance - my own or the other actors' - or the script or anything... But to me it seems there's only one place in the world the camera can be, and the decision usually comes immediately.
Ang Lee is very precise. He will show you everything, and will let you know what he is thinking about the whole project. There are a lot of rehearsals before shooting, and you already reach a certain standard. Then he will ask for more.
My films have always been considered the benchmark in action. I have a big responsibility to shoulder.
It's just about going out and getting the shot, so I have a great understanding of how to execute it, so that really helps me, and also having a good understanding of all the action that I'm shooting, it helps me in determining how I'm going to capture it.
My principal job is to make interesting and entertaining films, and I'm not proud of which format or which particular technique I use. I just wanted the film to look good.
It doesn't matter how big or small your film is: you still don't have enough money. You don't have enough time to shoot it.