I've always felt that the quality of the voice is where the real content of a song lies. Words only suggest an experience, but the voice is that experience.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
My songs were always about the tone of voice rather than the words.
I don't really care about audio quality. If people saw some of the ways that I record stuff, they'd see I don't care in that respect. I obviously care about things sounding good, but I think quality exists through other things like emotionally connecting with a lyric or a feeling, or whatever.
The louder I sang, the more it brought out the basic quality of the voice.
It's amazing to hear, as a voice matures and then starts to decline, what kind of emotion is still conveyed by a really good vocalist.
As I've gone along, I felt like I was discovering an aspect of my voice that I didn't know was there: an ability to interpret a song in a way that makes it more accessible.
A pleasant voice, which has to include clear enunciation, is not only attractive to those who hear it... its appeal is permanent.
When a singer truly feels and experiences what the music is all about, the words will automatically ring true.
When you raise your voice in song to express what's going on deep inside of you, I think people just react to that because it's so truthful. It's so raw.
The quality of the writing, really. Simple as that. Beautiful words. It's very nice as a singer to do great songs, which have wonderful lyrics and strong feelings underneath the song.
And in singing, what my voice lacked in quality it made up for in volume.
No opposing quotes found.