If the thrill of hunting were in the hunt, or even in the marksmanship, a camera would do just as well.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There's nothing like being shot on camera.
Anyone who thinks hunters are just 'bloodthirsty morons' hasn't looked into hunting. If you wait through long, cold hours in the November woods with a bow in your hands hoping a buck will show, or if you spend days walking in the African bush trailing Cape buffalo while listening to lions roar, you're sure to learn hunting isn't about killing.
I'd come into filmmaking as a painter so, for me, making 'Good Will Hunting' was experimental because I didn't know how to do it.
Hunting is not a sport. In a sport, both sides should know they're in the game.
If you live in the countryside, you understand that hunting isn't just for toffs. It's for the farmers. It's for everyone's enjoyment.
I haven't been hunting for years. It is just a tradition I grew up with.
I don't oppose hunting in any way, shape or form. If that's what you enjoy doing, you are free to do it.
Cameras aren't guns. They can't really hurt you.
Actually, I'm not all that interested in the subject of photography. Once the picture is in the box, I'm not all that interested in what happens next. Hunters, after all, aren't cooks.
We ought to ban hunting, I suggest, if there isn't a purpose other than sport and fun. That should be against the law. It's time now.