One of the first courses I ever taught at Dartmouth was on the Bible as literature.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Then I studied theology in college, and when I was getting a Ph.D. in literature, I took courses in New Testament studies and studied Greek versions of the Gospels.
By the time I went to college, I knew the major passages of the Bible pretty much by heart.
There are two methods for the literary study of any book - the first being the study of its thought and emotion; the second only that of its workmanship. A student of literature should study some of the Bible from both points of view.
For this reason, to study English literature without some general knowledge of the relation of the Bible to that literature would be to leave one's literary education very incomplete.
Before college, I hadn't voluntarily read anything that might be called literature; I didn't think I'd understand it; I never seemed to understand my English teacher's interpretations of what we read.
Victorian literature was my subject at Harvard.
There is a quiet revolution going on in the study of the Bible. At its center is a growing awareness that the Bible is a work of literature and that the methods of literary scholarship are a necessary part of any complete study of the Bible.
A thorough knowledge of the Bible is worth more than a college education.
We believed that to understand literature, you had to understand its place in history and culture.
I was taught a lot of Bible at home and had a voracious appetite for reading the Bible.