Unless the local community signs up, wildlife won't survive. And without wildlife, no one will visit.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
If we bring together the right people, communities can flourish and wildlife can survive alongside them.
When it comes to wilderness animals we have to make an effort to preserve what areas we can that they can be themselves in. Its come to a point though, clearly, where some species have to be cared for by humans if they are not going to disappear altogether.
All over the world the wildlife that I write about is in grave danger. It is being exterminated by what we call the progress of civilization.
People are not going to care about animal conservation unless they think that animals are worthwhile.
A lot of money could be saved if we ate urban wildlife.
People need to look at wildlife conservation in its totality. As soon as you lose the apex predator, it has harmful consequences right down the food chain.
Habitat for wildlife is continually shrinking - I can at least provide a way station.
If you take away the predators in the prairies and the national parks, you suddenly have an explosion of elk, and then you have a lack of the food source for the elk, so they strip all the ground bare and that takes away the cover, on and on and on and on. The whole food chain is disrupted.
I often have deer on my property and there's a fox and owls. You're not going to see that in the city.
Animals don't have anyone to protect them. If we don't stand up, the people who are harming animals will never get stopped.
No opposing quotes found.