I see myself as an interpretative actor rather than a creative one.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Acting isn't really a creative profession. It's an interpretative one.
I'm an actor and my job is to interpret.
An actor's job is about putting across the author's intention; I don't think of myself on the same level as a creator.
Being an actor all of my life is kind of a collaborative, social form of interpretive art. Sitting down with a blank page every day by yourself is a different feeling.
As a writer, I always think about who my prototype actors are, in my brain. It's helpful, as a writer, to think about that.
One of the things you hope you've done as a playwright is create roles that can sustain different interpretations.
I always considered myself as a character actor. I always try to be versatile to show different sides of human experience.
Some actors, I think, want to feel that they are as creative as the writer. And the answer is, frankly, they're not.
I don't really view myself as an actor.
I feel like my responsibility as an actor is to make characters as compelling and believable as possible.