Media reporting denied privacy to anybody doing what I do for a living. It was no longer possible to work on your picture in privacy.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
We've come to expect so little from online privacy measures that public displays of concern about the matter are more or less for show. Being devastated to discover you've been tagged in somebody else's photo has an air of the melodramatic about it at this point.
All the legal action I've taken against newspapers has had a massively positive effect on my life and achieved exactly what I wanted, which is privacy and non-harassment.
To be honest, I'm a little upset these days. My family has been exposed to the media. Some people break into our house. My ex-girlfriend's photos are circulating online. To say that these are things I need to endure for the sake of celebrity... that's sad. I want to respectfully request that my private life remain private.
Photos were seen as the most private type of content, and 'Instagram' really flipped that on its head and said photos can be really public.
I've never been able to control my public image.
You have to fight for your privacy or you lose it.
Unfortunately, several companies are attempting to deceive consumers through the unauthorized use of my image or my name, and my attorneys are pursuing those making these false claims.
In France we have a law which doesn't allow the press to publish a photo that you didn't approve. It lets the paparazzi take the picture, but if they publish this picture, you have the choice to sue the newspaper. So me, I always sued them.
I get into all sorts of trouble with my publicists and with newspapers because I won't do photographs.
When someone takes a private photo, on a private cell phone, it should remain just that: private.
No opposing quotes found.