Texas has done a very good job of securing their borders with the help of the federal government. California has done a good job.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
For a border state, I would argue that Texas is less lunatic on the subject of immigration issues than other places around it, like Arizona. They're much more comfortable with their long-term identity as a place with a very large Hispanic population.
Who today is willing to say that Texas and California and the remainder of the Southwest would be better off if they were governed by Mexico?
Texas has more effectively capitalized on its opportunities as a border state, and I've always said that I want to look to states that are doing better than we are and replicate those success stories in Arizona.
It's always bothersome when California does something better than Texas.
I support secure borders both north and south and I support a guest worker program for those here today illegally. Labor and skilled workers are critical to our Texas economy.
The federal government secures the border; Californians decide how we want to treat our population. I think we need a vibrant guest worker program. If we have one, we're going to stop having a lot of issues at the border.
I supported Arizona's immigration law by joining in that lawsuit to defend it. Every day I have Texans on that border that are doing their job.
Thriving economies on both sides of the border is a win-win for Arizona and Mexico, but that will only come by working together and demonstrating mutual respect.
California is going to be quite good for the Democrats. But the rest of the country is a draw.
We must safely secure our border by investing in more law enforcement and technology, and receiving cooperation from the Mexican government.
No opposing quotes found.