I think it's prima facie evidence for the existence of God because for me to grow up and actually end up working with Glen Campbell is almost unbelievable.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I can't prove it scientifically, that there's a God, but I believe.
The purpose of this study is to offer a logical, practical, pragmatic proof of the existence of God from a purely scientific perspective.
The more science learns, the more I'm convinced that God is real.
I want some fact-based evidence about where we came from. Things we consider mysterious need not be attributed to a deity.
I believe that the question of the existence of God is an impenetrable mystery and beyond human comprehension.
I think, if you can prove the existence of God, it can only be proven through love.
I could prove God statistically. Take the human body alone - the chances that all the functions of an individual would just happen is a statistical monstrosity.
The very impossibility in which I find myself to prove that God is not, discovers to me his existence.
I think, that if you can prove the existence of God, it can only be proven through love.
To a certain extent I am taking a leap of faith. I'm adding up the evidence on either side, and I'm seeing the evidence of there not being a God is overwhelming compared to the evidence for there being a God.