The purpose of this study is to offer a logical, practical, pragmatic proof of the existence of God from a purely scientific perspective.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
My feeling, of course, is that it's ludicrous to try to prove God's existence by science. God has nothing to do with science. God has all to do with soul, and who can explain that?
It is possible to demonstrate God's existence, although not a priori, yet a posteriori from some work of His more surely known to us.
Theology is a science of mind applied to God.
My view is that science only has something to say about a very particular notion of God, which goes by the name of 'god of the gaps'.
God is not a hypothesis derived from logical assumptions, but an immediate insight, self-evident as light. He is not something to be sought in the darkness with the light of reason. He is the light.
I think, that if you can prove the existence of God, it can only be proven through love.
It is characteristic of science that the full explanations are often seized in their essence by the percipient scientist long in advance of any possible proof.
In the past, secularists sought to challenge dogma by the use of rational argument, claiming, for example, that miracles described in the Bible are scientifically impossible.
I can't prove it scientifically, that there's a God, but I believe.
As set forth by theologians, the idea of 'God' is an argument that assumes its own conclusions, and proves nothing.