I think 'The Lost World' could've been a successful movie except for the fact that it pre-dated the good special effects and computer graphics.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think there's really only been one successful video game adaptation, and that was probably 'Tomb Raider.' Whether or not you thought it was a good movie, it was successful financially.
The only sci-fi movie that I've ever been offered that, had circumstances been different, I would have definitely done, was 'Avatar.' And I literally couldn't do it because of my schedule. But listening to James Cameron talk about 'Avatar' was so fascinating. Because he literally invented the world in his mind - and it literally existed.
1925's 'The Lost World' is... really, everything a dinosaur movie should be. Like a dinosaur, this classic was once extinct too, existing as mere fragmentary footage and stills, but cinemaphile fossil-hunters have painstakingly excavated bits and pieces from obscure archives and assembled them into a nearly-complete animal.
I think you kind of need to acknowledge that the reason why sequels do well is because people that loved the first one come back.
It doesn't really matter if this movie's a success or not, because it's already out there.
Sometimes it's great, sometimes it's bad. I think the film could have been a lot better.
So, it didn't do well. But now when I talk to kids who are first seeing it, they're surprised to hear the movie failed at the box office. Sometimes that's what happens.
'Jurassic Park' was able to get away with big, dynamic filmmaking that might be out of place in another kind of story.
I think, if I had a big flop, that probably it would have ended the string at Disney, but it didn't! Every film was a success.
Just making a movie the way 'All is Lost' had to be made was a great experience, because it was structured differently than any other film I will make for the rest of my life.