If your theory is found to be against the second law of theromodynamics, I give you no hope; there is nothing for it but to collapse in deepest humiliation.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I'm not sure what theory is, unless it's the pursuit of fundamental questions.
Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true.
I've got a theory that if you give 100% all of the time, somehow things will work out in the end.
Most physicists like myself won't believe the result until every possible caveat has been investigated and/or the result is confirmed elsewhere.
Our society is dependent on some precarious mechanisms, and they are very dicey. They can easily collapse.
Whenever a theory appears to you as the only possible one, take this as a sign that you have neither understood the theory nor the problem which it was intended to solve.
Never abandon a theory that explains something until you have a theory that explains more.
It really is a nice theory. The only defect I think it has is probably common to all philosophical theories. It's wrong.
I think a moment of critical energy has suddenly emerged. But moments like this come and go unless we seize them at their height.
There could be no fairer destiny for any physical theory than that it should point the way to a more comprehensive theory in which it lives on as a limiting case.