It really is a nice theory. The only defect I think it has is probably common to all philosophical theories. It's wrong.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Theorists can be wrong; only nature is always right.
Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true.
I'm not sure what theory is, unless it's the pursuit of fundamental questions.
Theories, for me, are just about freeing your mind. It doesn't mean the theory is going to work like a scientific theory works. It's about freeing your mind and making you think a different way.
The incorrectness and weaknesses of a theory cause other minds to formulate the problems more exactly and in this way scientific progress is made.
The standard theory may survive as a part of the ultimate theory, or it may turn out to be fundamentally wrong. In either case, it will have been an important way-station, and the next theory will have to be better.
You know very well that unless you're a scientist, it's much more important for a theory to be shapely, than for it to be true.
Every theory presented as a scientific concept is just that; it's a theory that tries to explain more about the world than previous theories have done. It is open to being challenged and to being proven incorrect.
A theory has only the alternative of being right or wrong. A model has a third possibility: it may be right, but irrelevant.
We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct. My own feeling is that it is not crazy enough.