I've come to learn there is a virtuous cycle to transparency and a very vicious cycle of obfuscation.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I believe in transparency.
Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder, has on several occasions talked about transparency as an absolute principle. I don't personally believe that.
Transparency is not the same as looking straight through a building: it's not just a physical idea, it's also an intellectual one.
We actually use a lot of improvisation on 'Transparent.'
I believe that transparency is the solution to our problem on corruption.
If you live in the overlapping world of politics and media, as I am learning, anything less than full transparency can potentially do you in.
I felt that it's best just to be as transparent as possible.
This whole idea of visibility by the public creates a pretty powerful lever. In the new transparency era, you are able to make change you would otherwise have difficulty making. It's no longer possible for somebody just to bury the problem. It's the reason why things like WikiLeaks are important.
If you have nothing to hide, there is no reason not to be transparent.
We live in a culture of destructive transparency.