From 1940 to the present, the art world - and particularly Los Angeles - has undergone a transformation not unlike the Italian Renaissance.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
When art has changed, it's because the world was changing.
I've become convinced that Los Angeles is going to become the next contemporary art capital - no other city has more contemporary gallery space than Los Angeles. We've come into our own, finally.
Does art have a future? Performance genres like opera, theater, music and dance are thriving all over the world, but the visual arts have been in slow decline for nearly 40 years. No major figure of profound influence has emerged in painting or sculpture since the waning of Pop Art and the birth of Minimalism in the early 1970s.
In many respects, theater is still grappling with problems of reality and representation that the visual art movement realized were unimportant many years ago.
As a result of World War II, European artists migrated to America, enlarging the scene and diminishing Paris as the center. America was beginning its dominance of the art world with the emergence of the Abstract Expressionists.
Our culture now wonderfully, alchemically transforms images and history into artistic material. The possibilities seem endless and wide open.
What you have now is a Hollywood that is pure poison. Hollywood was a central place in the history of art in the 20th century: it was human idealism preserved. And then, like any great place, it collapsed, and it collapsed into the most awful machinery in the world.
In its most limited sense, modern, art would seem to concern itself only with the technical innovations of the period.
I'm looking to evolve the concept of the new renaissance artist, taking the world by storm through the art of public display and demonstration, with technical savvy, using cell phones and computers.
What the art world has done, it has been constantly been pushing the boundaries about what art can be. It's like expanding its territory.
No opposing quotes found.