Altman works in such an interesting way, letting things occur in the film even if he didn't particularly plan them.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Altman was told they wouldn't do the film with me. He could easily have abandoned me, but he stood by me and really bailed me out.
With Altman, he does discuss everything with you, but then leaves you to it and gives you full rein and lets you improvise and create a character while the camera is rolling.
People so far have been very fond of the Robert Altman movie, as I am, and when one things goes well it shines light on your other projects and now I seem to have a number of projects that are moving forward.
The only other things, and again these things are hearsay, is that he could be pretty rough on directors, because he knew exactly the way he wanted to play the part. And he did so.
I've worked with Robert Altman a couple of times too.
I'm a huge Robert Altman fan and don't take issue with his filmmaking, as eccentric as it is. But I just think 'Nashville' was a world he didn't know.
I like the way Wiseman builds a story in an unconventional way.
I'm fascinated with films that deal with strategy because there's a right way and a wrong way to get the job done.
To me, the director is the most important, rather than the story.
Robert Altman was a very jovial guy and obviously a famed improviser and perhaps less effective in post-production, which is like the crystallising process. So I found myself at sea often with him because we'd have conversations about what music is, and in the end, I don't know how interested he was?
No opposing quotes found.